|
Philosophy
Philosophy (10)Resources on the range of human thought that has been expressed in response to the enigma of existence through the ages.
Thursday, 16 July 2009 22:13
Paradox 2 - the set that cannot contain itselfWritten by starstrewnsky
Or to put it more simply: A popularised version of Bertrand Russell's paradox is to imagine a place where there is a male Barber. He shaves all the men who do not shave themselves. Does he shave himself? He cannot, because he can only shave those who do not shave themselves. If he does not, then he does not shave himself and therefore is part of the set of those who do not shave themselves, and he must shave himself... Wittgenstein claimed to have solved this paradox (Russell's theory of types) in his 'Tractatus'. Essentially he claimed it showed a problem with using language to describe the world and used logical symbols to refute it. You can read more on this here, at project Euclid
Published in
Philosophy
When I was fresh out of university, I worked as a typesetter and proofreader. I was not very good at it because I could not quite stop myself from reading the books, when I should have been meticulously checking them for errors. One book that was particularly distracting was 'All life is problem solving', by Karl Popper. The full stops, paragraph breaks and em-rules cascaded past my attention like animals escaping a zoo as I turned the pages, transfixed. I recently found some post it notes upon which I had scrawled this particularly inspiring passage from the book: "I am anything but an enemy of religion. My religion is the doctrine of the splendours of the world; of the freedom and creativity of wonderful human beings; of the terror and suffering of the despairing people we can help; of the extent of good and evil that has emerged in human history and keeps emerging over and over again; of the joyful message that we can prolong people's lives, especially those of women and children who have had the toughest life. I know nothing else. And although the scientific quest for truth is part of my religion, the magnificent scientific hypotheses are not religion - that must never be"
Published in
Philosophy
Tagged under
The precepts seem quite sensible, but there is a paradox here. We are told that we must end suffering by ending wanting. But wanting to end suffering is in itself a further want. So, by wanting to decrease our suffering we are actually increasing it. John Visvader refers to this as an uroboric (like a snake swallowing its own tail) philosophy. Wayne Alt argues that there is no paradox Al Herman replies to Wayne Alt
Published in
Philosophy
Tagged under
Today a though struck me, which I suppose could be posited as a moral dilemma. It came to me, ironically perhaps, as I was meditating: Would a true Buddhist save an animal species from extinction, if they were the only one who could, given the Buddhist belief in Nirvana (the end of the cycle of birth, death and rebirth) as the ultimate attainment and goal of being? A Buddhist should also believe in the application of right thought and of right action. Is it right to let an animal species die out when it could be prevented?
Published in
Philosophy
Tagged under
Epicurus was an interesting ancient Greek philosopher, I find a lot of his conclusions quite sensible and moderate - that death is the end and not to be feared, that a life of moderate pleasure and doing no harm should be one's goal. But, aside from his sensible and quite scientific ideas, he is well known for stating the following challenge to theistic arguments: The Problem of Evil"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil?"
Now, some philosophers state that what we consider to be evil is the product of free will. God created the universe and man to have the greatest good, and part of that good was the ability to choose to be good or to be evil, free will. However, while this might explain moral evils, such as genocide or murder, where human beings choose to do evil, it does not explain natural evil. Say a baby born to die of leukaemia, or a faun caught in a forest fire, caused to die in prolonged agony by its injuries. (see this PDF of 'The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism, by William L Rowe')
Published in
Philosophy
Imagine that you are a Doctor. You have five patients, each of whom has a terminal illness, each in a different major organ of the body. Without transplants from suitable donors they will certainly die. Now, another patient comes in for a routine check up and in the course of this you discover that they are a perfect match for each of the five other patients respectively, and that by taking their organs and transplanting them, you will have a 100 per cent certainty of saving those five people. The one donor patient will die. What should you do?
Published in
Philosophy
Tagged under
On September 10 2008, the large hadron collider was finally switched on. It is a machine that is at the cusp of human knowledge and endeavour, it will enable humanity to understand the universe and provide knowledge of benefit to all people, living and of the future.
Published in
Philosophy
Tagged under
3a A trolley (tram) is running out of control down a track. In its path are five people who have been tied to the track by a mad philosopher. Fortunately, you can flip a switch which will lead the trolley down a different track. Unfortunately, there is a single person tied to that track. Should you flip the switch?
3b. As before, a trolley(tram) is hurtling down a track towards five people. You are on a bridge under which it will pass, and you can stop it by dropping a heavy weight in front of it. As it happens, there is a very fat man next to you - your only way to stop the trolley is to push him over the bridge and onto the track, killing him to save five. Should you push him?
3c. As before, a trolley(tram) is hurtling down a track towards five people. As in the first case, you can divert it onto a separate track. On this track is a single person. However, beyond that person, this track loops back onto the main line towards the five, and if it weren't for the presence of that person, who will stop the trolley, flipping the switch would not save the five. Should you flip the switch?
Published in
Philosophy
Tagged under
2. The Plank of Carneades
of the ocean. They both see a plank that can only support one of them and both of them swim towards it. Sailor A gets to the plank first. Sailor B, who is going to drown, pushes A off and away from the plank and, thus, ultimately, causes A to drown. Sailor B gets on the plank and is later saved by a rescue team.
Published in
Philosophy
Tagged under
1. The 'famous violinist' thought experiment:
bed with an unconscious famous violinist.
to help. You have been kidnapped, and the violinist's circulatory system has been plugged into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own.
only nine months. By then he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you.
Published in
Philosophy
Tagged under
|
CategoriesWhat's new?
Quick inspiration
TweetsBuy me a coffee? |
||||
|
© Michael Fredman. Star Strewn Sky. Creative intelligence: Art,writing,music,thought etc.. Free template 'Colorfall' by [ Anch ] Gorsk.net Studio. Please, don't remove this hidden copyleft! |